Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if i have said it ,unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.

-Buddha


Monday, August 30

AN ANALYSIS OF VEDIC VS. DARWINIST CLAIMS: How Quantum Physics Trumps Modern Biology

There is a book by a famous world-class biologist named Richard Dawkins: The God Delusion. It is very well written, supported, and convincing. In it he explains how Darwinism is completely correct, and all of modern science- especially biology and chemistry- support this. He also details how religions are baseless and unprovable.

There is another book by a world renowned spiritualist and medical doctor named Deepak Chopra: Life After Death. It is also very well written, supported, and convincing. In this book he explains how life after death is quite well proven, logical, and simply common sense. He also claims that the afterlife is universal, fitting each person's religion that passes. Melding Vedic and Buddhist teachings with modern science, he makes the fear of death seem pointless.

Being open minded, I read both of those books and found them both fascinating. In Chopra's book, he mentions Dawkins' concept of "memes" and explains them, even though he does not agree with the idea. Memes sound to me like what used to be called race memories, as well as societal mores. Using them to explain away soul was not Dawkins' finest moment.

Although Dawkins wrote an excellent book with a lot of very good points and ideas, it is basically not possible to agree with both books' themes simultaneously. As much as I wish I were simply an atheist, I must admit Chopra's book was more intriguing and realistic. If we want to believe that we are more than the sum of our parts- which for humans is a heap of a few trillion cells in a water bag- then we must err on the side of the Akashic field Chopra espouses.

It would be very convenient to think evolution is the bottom line for everything; but I have yet to hear a biological explanation for ghosts, clairvoyance, E.S.P., full xenoglossy, reincarnation, NDE's, nor the accounts of delogs. I have also had personal experiences that prove otherwise.

Like the UFO debunker buffoons, the strict Darwinists will go to such great lengths to refute the obvious that their explanations frequently sound more implausible than the event or process they are trying to convince people never happened. Most of their assertions are downright absurd. In this spirit, I guess you could say, I would be quite amused to hear their explanation for ghosts- especially the ones that interact in real time with their observers.

Reading these books, especially Chopra's, have led me to form my own conclusions about the afterlife. They are not Chopra's views necessarily, nor do they conflict with his as far as I know, but more of an extension of what he left out of his book. I must point out that he is a little too lenient on some people who are obvious nuts, such as his apparent belief in catholic hallucination tales. Regardless, his conclusions on what the afterlife entails leads me to a more detailed- erstwhile succinct- conclusion.

I have thereby come to believe that the Vedic rishis and Buddhist monks are indeed correct. The Akashic field is real, and the universe is like a giant brain: alive, all knowing and powerful, superconscious, self-creating and self-perpetuating. We humans are but cells within this brain. The other deities thought up over time are also real, and are more like what we currently think of as demi-gods or more likely, advanced humanoid life forms higher than us. We are frequently recycled, as dead cells in our bodies are. We maintain a link to our past cell-like existence via the encoded info in the spaces between our DNA helices on a subatomic level. Quantum physics comes into the equation in a big way, and meshes in perfectly with the ideals of Eastern thought.

When people die, physically, they see an image of an archetype that matches their religion. It reinforces their beliefs and they go into a pseudo-aware state that is akin to dreaming. They believe they are in the afterlife they expected. If they thought when they died that they deserved a Christian hell, then they will be in a Christian hell nightmare, as physically real to them as their former reality. If they think they deserved to go to a Christian heaven, they will enjoy that existent state. The same is true for any person of any religion. The Akashic field knows their mind and initiates a loop of their expectations. This continues until they are reborn. Rebirth could be right away, or a few centuries from then. The whole time they are in a Matrix-like state. It would indeed be very similar to the movie: everyone dreaming, their bodies preserved while wires going into their heads induce a common dream state. Their whole lives turn out to be a dream program run by a giant computer. Here, the giant computer is the Akashic field, or brain that is the universe.

What is profoundly disturbing about all this is three things:
1. all deeds go unpunished. there is no afterlife consequence for people who do not believe in hell or its equivalent. psychopaths that enjoy killing people or worse, and do not believe in a religion, will rest comfortably after death and no punishment will ever occur.
2. the illusion that is religion is coddled so to speak by the field, and even after death, few learn the truth of the higher planes and the greater scheme of things. once a worker cell, always a worker cell. ignorance and disproven dogma are rewarded with a dream state of the fantasy.
3. upon reincarnation, if ever, the lessons of this are lost and our ignorant souls are recycled, doomed to start the process again.

Death, rest, reincarnate. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Since atheists have made a pseudo-religion in itself out of being anti-religion, they would simply rest with no dream at all until reincarnation. Occam's razor is frequently held up by Christians as a scare tactic to to get people to believe their bible. I say it applies much more appropriately here. If you want any chance of breaking the cycle and advancing to a higher existence than as a sort of worker cell, then you should learn all you can about Eastern thought before you die. If it is wrong, you did not waste your time: the holy men of India and Tibet have some really impressive morals and ideals that are worth emulating. The same cannot be said for the contents of the Christian bible, with all of its murder, rape, slavery, butchery, genocide, and other self-contradictory nonsense and mayhem. So leave Occam's Razor to the East, if you please.

In conclusion, I suspect that the few true mediums such as John Edwards and James VanPraagh are contacting passed people in the rest state, where they are in the middle of their dream matrices. I also feel that hedonism is a valid path  for those wanting to enjoy what lives they have left, since the afterlife is a fantasy and this life is rarely remembered into the next one.

Party up.

No comments:

Post a Comment